On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 03:22:03PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> On 2016/04/04 20:35, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Etsuro Fujita
> ><fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> >>Here is a patch to fix this issue. As proposed by Michael, I modified
> >>execute_dml_stmt so that it uses PQsendQueryParams, not PQexecParams. Any
> >>comments are welcome.
>
> >+ * This is based on pqSocketCheck.
> >+ */
> >+ bool
> >+ CheckSocket(PGconn *conn)
> >+ {
> >+ int ret;
> >+
> >+ Assert(conn != NULL);
> >Instead of copying again pqSocketQuery, which is as well copied in
> >libpqwalreceiver.c, wouldn't it be better to use WaitLatchOrSocket
> >with the socket returned by PQsocket?
>
> Will check. Thanks for the comment!
What do you think? This open item's seven-day deadline has passed. It would
help keep things moving to know whether you consider your latest patch optimal
or whether you wish to change it the way Michael described.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
