On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Or in short: this is a whole lot further than I'm prepared to go to > satisfy one customer with a badly-designed application. And from what > I can tell from the Feb 2015 discussion, that's what this has been > written for.
This holds true. I imagine that a lot of people at least on this list have already spent some time in tracking down long-running transactions in someone's application and actually tuned the application so as the bloat gets reduced and things perform better for other transactions taking a shorter time. Without the need of this feature. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
