On 2016-04-19 12:03:22 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Kevin Grittner wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > The right thing to do about that is just change it back to the > > > way Kevin had it originally. > > > > Since this change to BufferGetPage() has caused severe back-patch > > pain for at least two committers so far, I will revert that (very > > recent) change to this patch later today unless I hear an > > objections. > > I vote for back-patching a no-op change instead, as discussed elsewhere.
What about Tom's argument that that'd be problematic for external code? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
