On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Ants Aasma <ants.aa...@eesti.ee> wrote:
> However, while checking out if my proof of concept patch actually > works I hit another issue. I couldn't get my test for the feature to > actually work. The test script I used is attached. Could you provide enough to make that a self-contained reproducible test case (i.e., that I don't need to infer or re-write any steps or guess how to call it)? In previous cases people have given me where they felt that the feature wasn't working there have have been valid reasons for it to behave as it was (e.g., a transaction with a transaction ID and an xmin which prevented cleanup from advancing). I'll be happy to look at your case and see whether it's another such case or some bug, but it seems a waste to reverse engineer or rewrite parts of the test case to do so. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
