On 2016-05-02 10:32:28 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > You are certainly welcome to add a new open item to cover those > complaints.
Done that. > But I do not want to blur together the discussion of > whether the feature is well-designed with the question of whether it > regresses performance when it is turned off. Those are severable > issues, meriting separate discussion (and probably separate threads). The current thread already contains a lot of information about both, so separating doesn't seem beneficial. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
