On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> There is a long-running thread on pgsql-hackers on whether 9.6 should >> instead be called 10.0. > > First I've seen it mentioned here. > > I think you are just about exactly one week too late to bring this up. > Once we've shipped a beta, rebranding is way too confusing.
So, not that it makes any difference at this point, but this seems to fly in the face of what you said before. http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/24567.1456864...@sss.pgh.pa.us Unless you thought that beta wasn't going to be out until the fall. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
