On 5/31/16 7:04 PM, Peter van Hardenberg wrote:
The idea of converting a JSONB array to a PG array is appealing and would potentially be more general-purpose than adding a new unnest. I'm not sure how feasible either suggestion is.
The one part I think is missing right now is unnest allows you to 'stitch' or 'zip' multiple arrays together into a single recordset via unnest(array1, array2, ...). Presumably that could be added to the json equivalents.
I will say that I think the current state of affairs is gratuitously verbose and expects users to memorize a substantial number of long function names to perform simple tasks.
+100. It's *much* easier to deal with JSON in other languages because they have native support for the concept of a dictionary, so changing an element is as simple as json['foo'][3] = 'new'. Trying to do that in Postgres is horrible partly because of the need to remember some odd operator, but moreso because it's ultimately still an operator. What we need is a form of *addressing*. If you could directly access items in a JSON doc with [] notation then a lot of the current functions could go away, *especially* if the [] notation allowed things like a slice and a list of values (ie: json['foo', 'bar', 'baz'] = '[42,{"my": "nice object"},"with a random string"]'. Or = row(42, ...).
-- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
