On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > Well, I think we could drop node, if you like. I think parallel > > wouldn't be good to drop, though, because it sounds like we want a > > global limit on parallel workers also, and that can't be just > > max_workers. So I think we should keep parallel in there for all of > > them, and have max_parallel_workers and > > max_parallel_workers_per_gather(_node). The reloption and the Path > > struct field can be parallel_workers rather than parallel_degree. > > WFM. >
+1
