On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Josh berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > I was assuming that we would have *both* per-operation and per-statement > limits. I can see reasons for having both, I can see why power users > would want both, but it's going to be overwhelming to casual users.
I don't think so. I think the fact that this is per-gather-node rather than per-statement right now is basically a defect. Once we have a per-statement limit, I see no value in having the per-gather-node setting. So, yes, at that point, I would push to rename the GUC. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
