Folks, While constructing a somewhat hairy query with HAVING in it, I noticed that a lot of operators don't have negators, which would have been convenient for the class of queries I was constructing. Further investigation showed that while 380 of the built-in operators had negators, 395 do not.
For some fraction I'll investigate if warranted, a negator makes no sense. For the rest, I'd like to propose adding negator operators prefixed with '!', just as we have for the negators of regex-like things. What say? Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
