On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:02 PM, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote: > While constructing a somewhat hairy query with HAVING in it, I noticed > that a lot of operators don't have negators, which would have been > convenient for the class of queries I was constructing. Further > investigation showed that while 380 of the built-in operators had > negators, 395 do not. > > For some fraction I'll investigate if warranted, a negator makes no > sense. For the rest, I'd like to propose adding negator operators > prefixed with '!', just as we have for the negators of regex-like > things. > > What say?
How about using NOT? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
