On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes: >> On 06/07/2016 11:01 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >>> Here's a patch change max_parallel_degree to >>> max_parallel_workers_per_gather, and also changing parallel_degree to >>> parallel_workers. I haven't tackled adding a separate >>> max_parallel_workers, at least not yet. Are people OK with this? > >> +1 > > I've not read the patch in detail, but this sketch of what to do > sounds fine.
OK, I pushed this after re-reviewing it and fixing a number of oversights. There remains only the task of adding max_parallel_degree as a system-wide limit (as opposed to max_parallel_degree now max_parallel_workers_per_gather which is a per-Gather limit), which I'm going to argue should be a new open item and not necessarily one that I have to own myself. I would like to take care of it, but I will not put it ahead of fixing actual defects and I will not promise to have it done in time for 9.6. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
