On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: >> Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes: >>> OK, I committed this. Barring objections, I'll go ahead and pgindent >>> the whole tree tomorrow. If we're going to revert anything big then >>> we might want to hold off, but otherwise I think its better to get >>> this done sooner rather than later. >> >> Well, there are at least two patchsets we're actively discussing >> reverting, so I think this should wait till those decisions are resolved. > > OK, but that may well mean we don't get this done before beta1, which > I think is a bummer, but oh well.
So I really would like to get a pgindent run done. Any objections to doing it sometime RSN? It is of course possible that it might make something that we want to revert later harder to revert, but I think we should just accept that risk and move forward. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
