Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes:
> So I really would like to get a pgindent run done. Any objections to
> doing it sometime RSN? It is of course possible that it might make
> something that we want to revert later harder to revert, but I think
> we should just accept that risk and move forward.
Now that we bit the bullet on 137805f89, I do not think there's anything
else with a really high probability of being reverted. Might as well do
the run. Please note that typedefs.list is already out of date.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
