On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Andreas Seltenreich <seltenre...@gmx.de> wrote: > > Amit Kapila writes: > > > I have moved it to CLOSE_WAIT state because we have derived our > > queries to reproduce the problem based on original report[1]. If next > > run of sqlsmith doesn't show any problem in this context then we will > > move it to resolved. > > I don't have access to my testing horse power this weekend so I can > report on tuesday at the earliest. Unless someone else feels like > running sqlsmith… >
No issues and many thanks for testing. With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
