Amit Kapila writes: > Right, so I have moved "Failed assertion in parallel worker > (ExecInitSubPlan)" item to CLOSE_WAIT state as I don't think there is any > known pending issue in that item. I have moved it to CLOSE_WAIT state > because we have derived our queries to reproduce the problem based on > original report[1]. If next run of sqlsmith doesn't show any problem in > this context then we will move it to resolved.
It ran for about 100e6 queries by now without tripping on any parallel worker related assertions. I tested with min_parallel_relation_size_v1.patch applied and set to 64kB to have more exposure during testing. regards, Andreas -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
