On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:08 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Andreas Karlsson <andr...@proxel.se> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Here is an initial set of patches related to OpenSSL 1.1. Everything > should > > still build fine on older OpenSSL versions (and did when I tested with > > 1.0.2h). > > > > 0001-Fixes-for-compiling-with-OpenSSL-1.1.patch > > > > This patch fixes the code so it builds with OpenSSL 1.1 (except the > > CRYPTO_LOCK issue I have reported to the OpenSSL team). > > > > - Makes our configure script check for SSL_new instead > > - Uses functions instead of direct access to struct members > > > > 0002-Define-CRYPTO_LOCK-for-OpenSSL-1.1-compat.patch > > > > Fix for the removal of the CRYPTO_LOCK define. I am trying to convince > them > > to add the define back. :) > > > > 0003-Remove-OpenSSL-1.1-deprecation-warnings.patch > > > > Silence all warnings. This commit changes more things and is not > necessary > > for getting PostgreSQL to build against 1.1. > > > > - Silences deprecation other warnings related to that OpenSSL 1.1 now 1) > > automatically initializes the library and 2) no longer uses the locking > > callback. > > - Silences deprecation warning when generating DH parameters. > > Those patches are going to need a careful review by looking at the > areas they are changing, and a backpatch. On Arch there is no test > package available except in AUR. And that's the pre3 release, OpenSSL > folks are on pre5 now with their beta2. It would be annoying to > compile it manually, but if there is no other way... Is Debian up to > date with 1.1.0 beta2 in its snapshot packages? > Debian testing is still on 1.0.2h. Debian experimental is on 1.1.0pre5. Not sure here beta2 enters the discussion, it's not mentioned anywhere on their site? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
