Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > > Although this is in principle a bug fix, it's invasive enough that I'd > > be pretty hesitant to back-patch it, or even to stick it into HEAD > > post-beta. I'm inclined to sign it up for the next commitfest instead. > > Do we have a backpatchable fix for the reported problem? If so, then it > seems a good tradeoff to install this more invasive fix in HEAD only and > apply the simpler fix to back branches. Otherwise, is the proposal to > leave the bug unfixed in back branches?
I meant "install in HEAD only, after the 10.0 branch", which is what you proposed. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
