On 3 August 2016 at 05:14, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > In short, I think Uber's position that logical replication is somehow more > reliable than physical is just wishful thinking. If anything, my money > would be on the other way around: there's a lot less mechanism that can go > wrong in physical replication. Particularly since they aren't using row-based logical replication, but - it seems - statement based replication. We all know the problems there. Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
