"Joshua D. Drake" <j...@commandprompt.com> writes:
> On 08/03/2016 11:23 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think the realistic answer if you suffer replication-induced corruption
>> is usually going to be "re-clone that slave", and logical rep doesn't
>> really offer much gain in that.
> Yes, it actually does. The ability to unsubscribe a set of tables,
> truncate them and then resubscribe them is vastly superior to having to
> take a base backup.
True, *if* you can circumscribe the corruption to a relatively small
part of your database, logical rep might provide more support for a
partial re-clone.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
