Hi hackers, To do something about the confusion I keep seeing about what exactly "on" means, I've often wished we had "remote_flush". But it's not obvious how the backwards compatibility could work, ie how to keep the people happy who use "local" vs "on" to control syncrep, and also the people who use "off" vs "on" to control asynchronous commit on single-node systems. Is there any sensible way to do that, or is it not broken and I should pipe down, or is it just far too entrenched and never going to change?
-- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
