Re: Thomas Munro 2016-08-21 <CAEepm=0EQvwhFih7wZ+cHL=ujdvf4kse0thw1gpey-ga3dc...@mail.gmail.com> > Right, we could just add it to guc.c after "on", so that you can "SET > synchronous_commit TO remote_flush", but then "SHOW > synchronous_commit" returns "on". > > The problem I was thinking about was this: if you add "remote_flush" > before "on" in guc.c, then "SHOW ..." will return "remote_flush", > which would be really helpful for users trying to understand what > syncrep is actually doing; but it would probably confuse single node > users and async replication users.
Maybe "flush" would work, given it applies locally and on the remote side? (And "local" could be "local_flush"...?) Christoph -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
