On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:39:29AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> Now, one of the things discussed as well was that we may want to still >> keep pg_xlog, and soft-link to pg_journal or whatever-the-new-name is >> to not break the existing tools. Personally, I'd prefer a hard break. >> That would not be complicated to fix for any tool maintainers. > > I agree on a hard break, unless we get pushback from users, and even > then, they can create the symlinks themselves.
I strongly prefer symlink approach not to break many existing tools and scripts. Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
