Re: Fujii Masao 2016-08-26 
<cahgqgwhk2yimflvg_wq1vrq2h+cmzgv5u6oemxr-cbjro+w...@mail.gmail.com>
> > I agree on a hard break, unless we get pushback from users, and even
> > then, they can create the symlinks themselves.
> 
> I strongly prefer symlink approach not to break many existing tools
> and scripts.

Symlinks might actually be worse than removing the directories
altogether. If your backup tool fails because the pg_xlog directory is
gone, you'll hopefully notice, but if you end up with a backup that
consists merely of a copy of a symlink named pg_xlog, you might not
notice.

Christoph


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to