On 2016-08-31 23:40:46 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote: > It's an improvement (and it's pretty much exactly what I proposed > upthread). But it does not solve the problems with pg_statistic for > example (each backend needs it's own statistics. So we'd either bloat > the pg_statistic (if we manage to solve the problem that the table has > the same oid in all backends), or we would need in-memory tuples (just > like discussed in the thread so far).
Creating a session private version of pg_statistic would be fairly simple. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
