On 08/31/2016 11:43 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2016-08-31 23:40:46 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote: >> It's an improvement (and it's pretty much exactly what I proposed >> upthread). But it does not solve the problems with pg_statistic for >> example (each backend needs it's own statistics. So we'd either bloat >> the pg_statistic (if we manage to solve the problem that the table has >> the same oid in all backends), or we would need in-memory tuples (just >> like discussed in the thread so far). > > Creating a session private version of pg_statistic would be fairly > simple.
Sure. I'm just saying it's not as simple as overriding relpath. ISTM we only need the pg_statistics (as other catalogs are connected to the pg_class entry), which does not have the dependency issues. Or do we need other catalogs? regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
