Vik Fearing <v...@2ndquadrant.fr> writes: > On 09/08/2016 01:05 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> I'm pretty much -1 on printing a warning. There's no ambiguity, and no >> real reason for us ever to remove the old spellings. Standardizing on >> "no-" going forward makes sense, but let's not slap people's wrists for >> existing usage. (Or: if it ain't broke, don't break it.)
> One could also argue that 2 out of 53 "no" options omitting the dash is > in fact broken, and a real reason to remove them. I do not buy that. As a counter argument, consider that removing them would make it impossible to write a script that works with both old and new versions of PG. That's a mighty high price to pay for what is little more than pedantry. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers