Hi, On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 09:48 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: > Personally I would be pretty reluctant to package libicu when it's > already in RH/Fedora. If it were bundled in Pg's source tree and a > private copy was built/installed by the build system so it was part of > the main postgresql-server package that'd be different.
Agreed. I did not read the whole thread (yet), but if this is something like tzdata, I would personally want to use the libuci supplied by OS, like we do for tzdata. (That said, just checked EDB's ICU support. We currently ship our own libicu there, as a part of EPAS, but I don't know the reasoning/history behind there.) Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
