On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Devrim Gündüz <dev...@gunduz.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 09:48 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: >> Personally I would be pretty reluctant to package libicu when it's >> already in RH/Fedora. If it were bundled in Pg's source tree and a >> private copy was built/installed by the build system so it was part of >> the main postgresql-server package that'd be different. > > Agreed. I did not read the whole thread (yet), but if this is something like > tzdata, I would personally want to use the libuci supplied by OS, like we do > for tzdata. > > (That said, just checked EDB's ICU support. We currently ship our own libicu > there, as a part of EPAS, but I don't know the reasoning/history behind > there.)
We needed a specific version that was newer than that shipped with RHEL 6 (or in EPEL) iirc. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
