Uh, not sure. Does it guard against corrupt WAL records? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Curt Sampson wrote: > On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > Added to TODO: > > > > * Allow WAL information to recover corrupted pg_controldata > >... > > > Using pg_control to get the checkpoint position speeds up the > > > recovery process, but to handle possible corruption of pg_control, > > > we should actually implement the reading of existing log segments > > > in reverse order -- newest to oldest -- in order to find the last > > > checkpoint. This has not been implemented, yet. > > So if you do this, do you still need to store that information in > pg_control at all? > > cjs > -- > Curt Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org > Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
