On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Finally, extensions got their own category in this taxonomy, though I > wonder if it would be better to instead have > Activity/ExtensionActivity, Client/ExtensionClient, > Timeout/ExtensionTimeout, and IPC/ExtensionIPC instead of making it a > separate toplevel category.
I don't think that it is necessary to go up to that level. If you look at the latest patch, WaitLatch & friends have been extended with two arguments: classId and eventId, so extensions could just use WAIT_ACTIVITY as classId and WE_EXTENSION as eventId to do the equivalent of ExtensionActivity. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
