Re: Robert Haas 2016-09-28 <ca+tgmobb-iglrjfh+zfmpy00ysasecbxcrukjyhdneamyeb...@mail.gmail.com> > > Well, practically anything that includes a PID and the timestamp is > > going to be an improvement over the status quo. Just because we can't > > all agree on what would be perfect does not mean that we can't do > > better than what we've got now. +1 for trying. > > Is there any chance we can move forward here, or is this effort doomed for > now?
IMHO it would make sense. Maybe we should collect a few suggestions, and then take a poll? Christoph -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
