On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 9/28/16 6:13 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> Christoph/Debian: >> log_line_prefix = '%t [%p-%l] %q%u@%d ' >> Peter: >> log_line_prefix = '%t [%p]: [%l] %qapp=%a ' > > I'm aware of two existing guidelines on log line formats: syslog and > pgbadger. Syslog output looks like this: > > Sep 28 00:58:56 hostname syslogd[46]: some text here > > pgbadger by default asks for this: > > log_line_prefix = '%t [%p]: [%l-1] user=%u,db=%d,app=%a,client=%h ' > > I don't know why it wants that "-1" there, and I'm actually not sure > what the point of %l is in practice. Those are separate issues that are > having their own lively discussions at times. I could drop the [%l] > from my proposal if that causes concerns. > > On balance, I think my proposal is more in line with existing > wide-spread conventions.
As long as we get %t and %p in there we're going to be way ahead, really. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
