Jeff Janes <[email protected]> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Christoph Berg <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Patch attached. (Still using %t, I don't think %m makes sense for the
>> default.)
> What is the cost of using %m, other than 4 (rather compressible) bytes per
> log entry?
More log I/O, which is not free ... and that remark about compressibility
is bogus for anyone who doesn't pipe their postmaster stderr into gzip.
I'm already afraid that adding the timestamps will get us some pushback
about log volume.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
