Re: Jeff Janes 2016-10-12 <CAMkU=1zmop5t70mx508nwff8tvv2jot+hgwlq8fnhlsxp-w...@mail.gmail.com> > Do you think the pushback will come from people who just accept the > defaults?
I'm concerned about readability. "2016-10-12 20:14:30.449 CEST" is a lot of digits. My eyes can parse "20:14:30" as a timestamp, but "20:14:30.449" looks more like an IP address. (Admittedly I don't have experience with reading %m logs.) Overall, I'd prefer %t but %m would be ok as well. Christoph -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
