On 2016-11-01 09:56:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > The real problem with Oskari's theory is that it requires not merely > busted, but positively brain-dead error handling in the shell and/or > sqsh, ie ignoring open() failures altogether. That seems kind of > unlikely. Still, I suspect he might be onto something --- there must > be some reason you can reproduce the issue in production and not in > your test bed, and number-of-open-files is as good a theory as I've > heard.
I've seen shell code akin to exec >16 somefile # assume fd 16 is unused more than one :( -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
