On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > It applies the master and compiled cleanly and no error by > regtest. (I didn't confirmed that the problem is still fixed but > seemingly no problem)
Thanks for double-checking. > If I'm not missing something, at the worst we have a checkpoint > after a checkpointer restart that should have been supressed. Is > it worth picking it up for the complexity? I think so, that's not that much code if you think about it as there is already a routine to get the timestamp of the lastly switched segment that gets used by checkpointer.c. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
