On 11/18/16 12:38 PM, David Steele wrote: > On 11/14/16 4:29 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI >>> If I'm not missing something, at the worst we have a checkpoint >>> after a checkpointer restart that should have been supressed. Is >>> it worth picking it up for the complexity? > > That's the way I read it as well. It's not clear to me how the > checkpointer would get restarted under normal circumstances. > > I did a kill on the checkpointer and it was ignored. After a kill -9 > the checkpointer process came back but also switched the xlog. Is this > the expected behavior?
Ah, never mind. I can see this caused a restart and recovery so the archive timeout was reset and a switch occurred after timeout. -- -David da...@pgmasters.net -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
