On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:39:28 -0500 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:21 AM, Karl O. Pinc <k...@meme.com>
> > wrote:
> >> The bool types on the stack in logfile_rotate() are
> >> my work. Bools on the stack don't make sense as far
> >> as hardware goes, so the compiler's optimizer should change
> >> them to int. This patch changes the bools to ints
> >> should that be to someone's taste.
>
> > That does not seem like a good idea from here. Even if it buys some
> > microscopic speedup, in a place like this it won't matter. It's
> > more important that the code be clear, and using an int where you
> > really intend a bool isn't an improvement as far as clarity goes.
>
> Not to mention that the "bools on the stack don't make sense" premise
> is bogus anyway.
Thanks. I don't think I've paid attention since 8088 days, just always
used bools. We'll drop that patch then.
But this reminds me. I should have used a bool return value.
Attached is a version 2 of
patch_pg_current_logfile-v14.diff.deletion-v2
Karl <k...@meme.com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
patch_pg_current_logfile-v14.diff.deletion-v2
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
