On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I wrote: >> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> writes: >>> Tom: I expect pademelon to fail at the configure step, complaining that >>> "no source of strong random numbers was found". Let's wait for one >>> cycle, to verify that it does fail like that. After that, can you add >>> the --disable-strong-random flag to fix it, please? > >> Roger, I'll deal with that later today. > > Results seem to be as expected: > > http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=pademelon&dt=2016-12-05%2016%3A14%3A10 > > http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=pademelon&dt=2016-12-05%2022%3A19%3A42
Nice to see. I'll send a rebased patch set for SCRAM soon now that we know that things are fine here. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
