On 2016/12/16 17:38, Greg Stark wrote: > Just poking around with partitioning. I notice that "\d parent" > doesn't list all the partitions, suggesting to use \d+ but a plain > "\d" does indeed list the partitions. That seems a bit strange and > also probably impractical if you have hundreds or thousands of > partitions. Has this come up in previous discussions? Unfortunately > it's proving a bit hard to search for "\d" :/
Do you mean a plain "\d" (without an argument) should not list tables that are partitions? I think that might be preferable. That would mean, we list only the root partitioned tables with a plain "\d". Regarding "\d parent", it does the same thing as regular inheritance, but using the term "partition" instead of "child table". Without specifying a + (\d parent), one gets just "Number of partitions: # (Use \d+ to list them.)" and with + (\d+ parent), one gets the full list of partitions showing the partition bound with each. Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
