On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Amit Langote > <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> Aside from the above, I found few other issues and fixed them in the >> attached patches. Descriptions follow: > > To avoid any further mistakes on my part, can you please resubmit > these with each patch file containing a proposed commit message > including patch authorship information, who reported the issue, links > to relevant discussion if any, and any other attribution information > which I should not fail to include when committing?
I think it's a good advice and will keep in mind for any patches I post henceforth. In this particular case, I found all the issues myself while working with some more esoteric test scenarios, except the first patch (1/7), where I have mentioned in the description of the patch in the email, that there were independent reports of the issue by Tomas Vondra and David Fetter. Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
