2016-12-27 8:54 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com>: > Hi > > I reread ideas described on page https://github.com/trustly/plpgsql2 > > Some points are well and can be benefit for PlpgSQL. > > First I describe my initial position. I am strongly against introduction > "new" language - plpgsql2 or new plpgsql, or any else. The trust of > developers to us is important and introduction of any not compatible or > different feature has to have really big reason. PostgreSQL is conservative > environment, and PLpgSQL should not be a exception. More - I have not any > information from my customers, colleagues about missing features in this > language. If there is some gaps, then it is in outer environment - IDE, > deployment, testing, > > I forgot - the big plpgsql issue are too weak expressions on left part of assignment statements.
> > > Pavel >
