On 1/9/17 3:15 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
The running unsafe PL in own managed processes is good idea - Years, I
have a one diploma theme "better management of unsafe PL in Postgres" -
but still without any interest from students :(.  I had two
possibilities to see catastrophic errors related to wrong usage of
PLPerlu. If we can locks interpret/environment in some safe sandbox,
then it should be great.

Incidentally, Tom just observed in another thread that Tcl treats out of memory as a panic situation, so anyone using pltcl opens the risk of arbitrary database-wide panics. Fenced pltcl is one possible solution for that problem.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to