On 1/13/17 10:18 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: > The point I was making was that serious montioring systems would have to > be changed and I stand by that.
I don't think my monitoring systems are any less serious than yours. > Certainly, check_postgres is going to have to be changed to address this > and, unsurprisingly, it's already had to address a variety of major > version differences that have been introduced over the years. check_postgres will not need to be changed except for the actions that check the disk, which you don't need unless you are using archiving. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
