On 2017-02-03 19:26:55 -0600, Jim Nasby wrote: > On 2/3/17 6:20 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > > > - The ringbuffers in shared buffers can be problematic. One possible way > > > of > > > solving that is to get rid of ringbuffers entirely and rely on different > > > initial values for usage_count instead, but that's not desirable if it > > > just > > > means more clock sweep work for backends. > > I'm not quite sure which ringbuffer you're referring to here? If to the > > new one, why is it problematic? > > No, I mean the non-default BufferAccessStrategy's.
That's not a ringbuffer that's a buffer ring ;) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
