Hello, Thank you for the updated patch.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Mithun Cy <mithun...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi all, > Here is the new patch which fixes all of above comments, I changed the > design a bit now as below > > What is it? > =========== > A pair of bgwrokers one which automatically dumps buffer pool's block > info at a given interval and another which loads those block into > buffer pool when > the server restarts. > Are 2 workers required? This would reduce the number of workers to be launched by other applications. Also with max_worker_processes = 2 and restart, the system crashes when the 2nd worker is not launched: 2017-02-07 11:36:39.132 IST [20573] LOG: auto pg_prewarm load : number of buffers actually tried to load 64 2017-02-07 11:36:39.143 IST [18014] LOG: worker process: auto pg_prewarm load (PID 20573) was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault I think the document should also mention that an appropriate max_worker_processes should be set else the dump worker will not be launched at all. -- Thank you, Beena Emerson Have a Great Day!