On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Beena Emerson <memissemer...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes it would be better to have only one pg_prewarm worker as the loader is > idle for the entire server run time after the initial load activity of few > secs. Sorry, that is again a bug in the code. The code to handle SIGUSR1 somehow got deleted before I submitted patch_03 and I failed to notice same. As in the code loader bgworker is waiting on the latch to know the status of dump bgworker. Actually, the loader bgworker should exit right after launching the dump bgworker. I will try to fix this and other comments given by you in my next patch.
-- Thanks and Regards Mithun C Y EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
