On Feb 14, 2017, at 5:37 AM, Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> wrote:
>> Until pgxn has a way of helping users on for example Windows (or other >> platforms where they don't have a pgxs system and a compiler around), >> it's always going to be a "second class citizen". > > I view that as more of a failing of pgxs than pgxn. Granted, the most common > (only?) pgxn client right now is written in python, but it's certainly > possible to run that on windows with some effort (BigSQL does it), and I'm > fairly certain it's not that hard to package a python script as a windows > .exe. Yeah, that’s outside of PGXN’s mandate. It doesn’t do any installing at all, just distribution (release, search, download). Even the Python client just looks to see what build support is in a distribution it downloads to decide how to build it (make, configure, etc.), IIRC. David
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
