On Feb 14, 2017, at 9:37 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
> It's a failing in one of the two at least. It either needs to be easier to > build the things on windows, or pgxn would need to learn to do binary > distributions. PGXN makes no effort to support installation on any platform at all. Happy to work with anyone who wants to add binary distribution, but supporting multiple platforms might be a PITA. Maybe there’d be a way to integrate with the RPM and .deb and Windows repos (is there something like that for Windows?). > Even if we get the building easier on windows, it'll likely remain a second > class citizen (though better than today's third class), given the amount of > windows machines that actually have a compiler on them for start. Pgxs in > Windows would be a big improvement, but it won't solve the problem. Yep. David
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
